Wood House |
The study on combining the two existing schools into
one….and the reality is it would be at a ridiculous cost…and the study came to
the same conclusion that I gave a full talk on at another dinner party. It does not take a rocket scientist to know
that you can’t put small children in a big child facility.
The cost of building an addition would be outrageous for a
town of 5 thousand people and that selling the old building wouldn’t cover the
bills of the old building. So why do we pay for these ridiculous studies?
Then the talk spread to the big problem of some lawsuit that
is going to cause a tax reduction on wind farms assessment that is going to
hurt the school tax income…well that would be a problem! But where is the information on this? Why don’t we know about this? Who has this information?
I went on line and sure enough there are articles but none
that give a clear answer.
The existing problem is that we have no real tax base in
this rural area. “Agribusiness” is not
the same as storefronts, sales tax revenue (food is exempt from sales tax) and
no industry that pays a living wage and has benefits. (I bet a good 50% work for government or
schools that draw off more tax dollars)
We do have houses being sold for taxes in large numbers because
people cannot pay their taxes and these are sold to people who cannot fix them
up because they are poor… or to landlords who turn them into rentals.
Rentals lower the tax value of the houses around them in the
majority of cases…they also cause a fluctuation in the number of children who
attend the schools…some years many more…some years many less.
The need is for single-family houses that are in good
condition that raise the tax base and not for rentals that appeal to occupants
that are prone… in a rural area… to be poor and draw on government subsidies,
and yes that becomes a tax burden on the county tax payers.
So what is the answer???
The answer is a sustainable economy made up of the correct
percentages of industry, agriculture, retail and residential…something we have
ignored in this county for years…a county...I might add..that gives people working for it
insurance for life after only ten years...is run by supervisors on a flawed weighted
vote who are not particularly capable of spending enough time and energy on
problem solving for the future… reactive rather than proactive.
Oh well...
Oh well...
No comments:
Post a Comment